”Elie Wiesel” Institute`s Journal:
Holocaust. Studii şi cercetări, vol. XVI, suppliment no. 1/2024
List of Authors
Gábor Ádám was born in Cluj-Napoca in 1969. After spending three years with his family in Morocco between 1974 and 1977, he returned to Cluj, completed his secondary education, and graduated from the Technical University of Cluj in 1997 with a degree in computer engineering. Active in public life after the Romanian Revolution of 1989, he was president of the Hungarian Student Union of Cluj until 1993. From 1994 on, he worked for the Cluj branch of the Open Society Foundation as an office manager, project coordinator, and later deputy branch manager. After the Foundation’s restructuring in 2000, he continued to work at the Ethnocultural Diversity Resource Center, an NGO focused on inter-ethnic projects. Since 2011, he has developed a passion for genealogical research and has set up a service in increasing demand. He specializes in Jewish genealogy, but has also been involved in probate genealogy projects, working for both individuals and research agencies in Israel, France, Germany, and the United States. Contact: adam.g.gabor@gmail.com
Frank Baron (Ph.D.) is professor emeritus of German at the University of Kansas. Having specialized in fifteenth- and sixteenth-century literary history, as well as twentieth-century studies, he has published books and articles in both German and English, especially on the European Faust tradition (demonstrating how the story of Goethe’s Faust-figure originated and evolved). Responsible for his interest in the Holocaust were war experiences as a child in Hungary and conversations with his cousin, Mária Székely, the original translator of the Auschwitz Report into Hungarian. She introduced him to journalist Sándor Szenes. That acquaintance led to research and close collaboration on the Report’s broad international history and significance. That research has continued until the present day. Contact: fbaron@ku.edu
Fred R. Bleakley is a retired journalist, former reporter and editor for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Institutional Investor. He wrote the book The Auschwitz Protocols. Ceslav Mordowicz and the Race to Save Hungary’s Jews, published in 2023. He lives in Portland, Maine. Contact: fredbleak270@gmail.com
Anders E.B. Blomqvist, Ph.D. in History, is a senior lecturer at the School of Culture and Society, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden. His research focuses on modern history in Hungary and Romania, with a special emphasis on the Holocaust and economic nationalism. He authored Economic Nationalizing in the Ethnic Borderlands of Hungary and Romania: Inclusion, Exclusion, and Annihilation in Szatmár/Satu-Mare, 1867-1944, and co-edited Hungary and Romania beyond National Narratives: Comparisons and Entanglements. Contact: abq@du.se
Ovidiu Creangă (Ph.D. – King’s College, London) is a historian at the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany and a senior policy officer at the World Jewish Restitution Organization, both partner organizations based in New York City, USA. In his dual capacity, Dr. Creangă supports research and diplomatic efforts to secure compensation and restitution for Holocaust survivors worldwide and coordinates the writing of the history of the Claims Conference. He is the general editor of the forthcoming multi-volume series Documents Concerning the History of the Claims Conference, a curated collection of documents from the international archives of the Claims Conference. Prior to joining the Claims Conference, he was an applied researcher at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., where he documented the fate of Jewish, Roma, and religious minorities during the Holocaust in Romania for the museum’s Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos. Contact: Ovidiu.Creanga@claimscon.org
György Csepeli (Ph.D., D.Sc.) is Professor Emeritus of Social Psychology and Chair of the Interdisciplinary Social Science Research Doctoral Program at Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) in Budapest. Born in 1946, he graduated from ELTE in 1970. He received his Ph.D. from ELTE and his D.Sc. from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In addition to ELTE, he taught in several American universities. His research interests cover areas of the social psychology of intergroup relations, such as national identity, antisemitism, anti-Roma sentiments, and conflict resolution. He is involved in several European projects on discrimination and European identity. Contact: csepeli.gyorgy@gmail.com
László Csősz received a Ph.D. in History from the University of Szeged in 2011. He has been a contributor to the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (EHRI) project since 2010, and a national expert delegate at the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) since 2011. Dr. Csősz is a Historian and Senior Archivist at the Hungarian Jewish Museum and Archives in Budapest. His main fields of research interest include comparative genocide, Jewish social history, and the Holocaust in Hungary. He is the author or co-author/co-editor of seven books, including The Holocaust in Hungary. Evolution of a Genocide (Washington, D.C., USHMM, 2013) and the critical edition of Ernő Munkácsi’s How It Happened (Toronto, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2018, awarded the Choice’s Outstanding Academic Title), as well as of several articles and online publications. Contact: lcsosz@yahoo.com
Nicolae Drăgușin, born in 1983, is a researcher at the “Elie Wiesel” National Institute for the Study of the Holocaust in Romania. He received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from the Romanian Academy in 2013, and since 2020 he has been a Ph.D. student in Political Science at the University of Bucharest, preparing his thesis on Romanian citizenship between 1918 and 1948. He is also a member of the Romanian delegation to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). Contact: nicolaedr@yahoo.com
George Eisen (Ph.D.) is an internationally recognized author and a professor of political science, sport studies, and history. His scholarship includes numerous and diverse books and articles about the Holocaust. His book, Children and Play in the Holocaust, received the American Library Association’s Outstanding Academic Book of the Year Award, as well as the alternate selection of the Jewish Book Club. In 1993, he received a Fulbright Scholar appointment in Estonia. He received the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Award for Leadership from Nazareth College in 2013. He is also the recipient of three honorary doctorates from leading universities in Hungary, Chile, and Ukraine. His most recent book, A Summer of Mass Murder 1941, was selected by Knowledge Unlatched for Open Electronic Access. Contact: georgeeisen2@gmail.com
Attila Gidó (D.Sc.) is a senior researcher and department head at the Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities in Cluj, and archive director at the Institute for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at the Babeș-Bolyai University in Cluj. His main field of research is the history of Transylvanian Jewry in the 20th century. He has authored and edited several volumes and academic studies on the subject. Contact: attilagido@gmail.com
Jehuda Hartman (Ph.D.) specializes in the history of Hungarian Jews in modern times, in particular their stances relating to their country and people. He holds a Ph.D. in Jewish History from the Bar-Ilan University and a Ph.D. in Mathematics from the University of California in Los Angeles. He was associated with several universities and research institutions in Israel, the US, and Canada. Dr. Hartman developed computerized mathematical systems, which were implemented in Europe, Japan, and the US. He founded an Israeli company for developing industrial optimization systems and was its chief scientist. He is a recipient of the Israel National Prize. His book, Patriots without Homeland: Hungarian Jewish Orthodoxy from Emancipation to Holocaust, was published by the Academic Studies Press in Boston, in 2023. Contact: jehudah@gmail.com
Mariana Hausleitner (Ph.D., Dr.habil.) is P.D. Dr. Emerita from the Free University of Berlin. Her recent publications: „Viel Mischmasch mitgenommen.“ Die Umsiedlungen aus der Bukowina 1940, Berlin, 2018; „Eine Atmosphäre von Hoffnung und Zuversicht.“ Hilfe für verfolgte Juden in Rumänien, Transnistrien und Nord siebenbürgen ,1940-1944, Berlin, 2020; and Selbstbehauptung gegen staatliche Zwangs maßnahmen. Juden und Deutsche in Rumänien seit 1830, Berlin 2021. She also edited 149 documents about Romania in Die Verfolgung und Ermordung der europäischen Juden durch das nationalsozialistische Deutschland, 1933-1945, Bd. 13: Slowakei, Rumänien, Bulgarien, Berlin/Boston, 2018. Contact: m.hausleitner@t-online.de
Binyamin Hunyadi received his Ph.D. in Yiddish studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He is the editor and Hungarian translator of Zalmen Gradowski’s Yiddish memoirs, written during his time in the Auschwitz Sonderkommando, In the Heart of Hell: The Scroll of Auschwitz (2017). He authored multiple articles on Yiddish culture and literature in English, Hungarian, Hebrew, and Yiddish. He is currently working on the Index to Yiddish Periodicals Project at The National Library of Jerusalem. He is a fellow of the New Europe College, Bucharest. Contact: bzs.hunyadi@gmail.com
Radu Ioanid (D.Sc., Ph.D.) worked for 31 years as a researcher and a historian for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C. He is the author of several books on Romanian history and the Holocaust, including The Holocaust in Romania, The Iași Pogrom, a Photo Documentary, and The Ransom of the Jews: The Story of the Extraordinary Secret Bargain between Romania and Israel. He earned his first doctoral degree at the University of Cluj, Romania, and the second one at École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, in Paris, France. From 2018 to present, he has been an Associate Professor at the Political Science Department, Babeș-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca. From 2003 to 2004, he served as the Vice-President for the International Commission for the Study of the Holocaust in Romania, chaired by Elie Wiesel. In 2006, Dr. Ioanid received he distinguished rank of Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres, conferred by the French Minister of Culture; promoted in 2014 Officier des Arts et des Lettres. He received the 2018 Independent Publisher Book Award, Europe – Best Regional Non-Fiction, GOLD (tie) for his book The Iași Pogrom, June-July 1941, A Photo Documentary from the Holocaust in Romania, Indiana University Press, 2017. Since 2020, he is ambassador of Romania to the State of Israel. Contact: rvioanid@gmail.com
Ștefan Cristian Ionescu (Ph.D.) is currently the Theodore Zev and Alice R. Weiss-HEF Visiting Associate Professor in Holocaust Studies at Northwestern University, in Evanston (Illinois), USA. He is the author of several book chapters and articles in scientific journals such as Holocaust and Genocide Studies; Israel Journal of Foreign Policy; Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Ethnicity and Nationalism; Journal of Genocide Research; Holocaust Studies: A Journal of History and Culture; Yad Vashem Studies. Ionescu’s book, titled Jewish Resistance to “Romanianization”: 1940-1944, was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2015. Contact: ionescu@chapman.edu
László Karsai (Ph.D., D.Sc.) is Professor Emeritus of the Department of Modern History of the University of Szeged (SZTE). He teaches the history of Europe in the 20th century and leads courses on the history of Nazism, Fascism, Bolshevism, the history of the Hungarian Roma and Jewish Holocaust, and the history of antisemitism. He published several documentary books about the People’s Courts trials, almost a hundred studies about the persecution of the Hungarian Jews and Roma during World War II, and about the “Arrow Cross” regime. He was director of the Holocaust Center of the Hungarian Jewish Museum and Archives in Budapest (1998-2005), scientific adviser of the Budapest Holocaust Documentation Center (2003-2006). He is head of the Yad Vashem Archives Hungarian Research Group since 1994. Contact: karsai50@gmail.com
Adam Kerpel-Fronius was born in Budapest, Hungary, in 1975 and studied political science and history in Freiburg, Wrocław and the Berlin FU. He worked for the educational department of the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin since its opening in May 2005. Since 2009, he has been the manager of the Foundation’s project Information Portal to European Sites of Remembrance (Gedenkstättenportal), a website with information on several hundred memorial sites dedicated to victims of National Socialism all over Europe. Kerpel-Fronius is the editor of three autobiographies of Holocaust survivors from Eastern Europe and the curator of a bilateral German-Belarusian travelling exhibition titled “Extermination Camp Maly Trostenets. History and Remembrance”. He is also deputy member of the German delegation to IHRA and responsible for international relations of the Foundation. Contact: adam.kerpel-fronius@stiftung-denkmal.de
Judit Kónya obtained her Ph.D. in Hebrew and Jewish Studies from the Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) in Budapest in 2015. Dr. Kónya is a staff member of the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People in Jerusalem. She is also an Aikido teacher. Contact: judit.konya@nli.org.il
Judit Molnár (Ph.D., Dr.habil.) is associate professor of history at the University of Szeged. Since 1994, she is the deputy director of the Hungarian research group of the Yad Vashem Archives. She organized the first Hungarian permanent Holocaust exhibition and was the chief historical advisor at the Holocaust Memorial Center in Budapest (2009-2011). Her field of research is the history of the Jews in Hungary in the 20th century. She focuses on the history of the Hungarian Jewish Leaders during World War II and the role of the Hungarian Gendarmerie in the Holocaust. Professor Molnár is currently the leading historian of a joint project with the Wiesenthal Institute in Vienna, focusing on the fate of those who were deported from Hungary to Strasshof instead of Auschwitz, partly thanks to Rezső Kasztner. In connection with this topic, she published several books together with Dr. Kinga Frojimovics and Professor László Karsai. Contact: judit.molnar3@gmail.com
Enikő Orsolya Nagyi (D.Sc.) graduated from the Department of Journalism, Faculty of Political Science, Public Administration, and Communication (FSPAC), Babeș-Bolyai University (BBU) in Cluj-Napoca, where she also obtained an M.A. in Sociocultural Communication. She is a research fellow at the Institute for Holocaust and Genocide Studies of BBU and a lecturer at the FSPAC. She obtained her doctoral degree in political sciences from BBU, with a dissertation focusing on the fate of heirless or unclaimed Jewish property in Northern Transylvania after the Holocaust. Contact: nagyi.orsolya@fspac.ro
Attila Novák (Ph.D.) is a historian born in 1967. He is a senior research fellow at the Tamás Molnár Research Institute (Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest) and the Goldziher Ignac Institute of Jewish History and Culture in Budapest. He studied History and Philosophy at the Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences (ELTE) in Budapest, where he earned his M.A. and Ph.D. He also graduated from the CEU Nationalism Studies Program (M.A. 1999). He was an editor of the Hungarian Jewish cultural monthly Szombat from 1999 to 2011. He also studied at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (1994, with the help and guidance of Prof. Ezra Mendelsohn) as a research fellow and later received a post-doc scholarship from Yad Vashem (The International Institute for Holocaust Research, 2003). His field of academic interest encompasses the history of Hungarian Jewry during and after World War II, the 1944 Zionist Rescue Movement, and the political and ideological problems of Zionism in East-Central Europe and the State of Israel. He was the Cultural Attaché at the Embassy of Hungary in Tel Aviv between 2012 and 2016. He is a member of the Hungary Forum on the History of Hungarian Jewry, which is part of the Arnold and Leona Finkler Institute of Holocaust Research at the Bar-Ilan University in Israel. Contact: Novak.Attila@uni-nke.hu
Richárd Papp (Ph.D.) is associate professor of cultural anthropology and sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the Eötvös Loránd University from Budapest. His fields of teaching and research embrace cultural significances of religion, ethnicity, and nationalism. His research fields are socio-cultural memory and Jewish cultural identity. He has conducted fieldworks in Ukraine, Romania, Serbia, Israel, and Hungary. Recently, he led a research project supported by the Visegrád Fund: Research on Transgenerational Holocaust-memory in Central Europe. The aim of his research is to process and interpret recent meanings of Holocaust memory using qualitative social-science methods in Eastern and Central Europe. Contact: papp.richard@tatk.elte.hu
Paul Shapiro is the Deanie and Jay Stein Director of International Affairs and Director Emeritus of the Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). His involvement with the USHMM began during his prior career at the United States Information Agency and Department of State. He was an editor of the journal Problems of Communism (Washington) and editor-in-chief of the Journal of International Affairs (New York). As a consultant to the US Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI), he performed the research that led to the deportation of former Iron Guard leader Archbishop Viorel Trifa from the United States. He was a member of the Wiesel Commission and led the Museum’s successful campaign to open the archives of the International Tracing Service. His book The Kishinev Ghetto, 1941-1942: A Documentary History of the Holocaust in Romania’s Contested Borderlands appeared in 2015. Contact: pshapiro@ushmm.gov
Zoltán Tibori-Szabó (D.Sc., Dr.habil.) is professor of political communication at the Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences of the Babeş-Bolyai University (BBU) in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. He received his D.Sc. from BBU with a dissertation on the identity crisis of Transylvanian Jewry in the post-Holocaust period, published in 2007 (Árnyékos oldal [Shady Side], Koinonia, Kolozsvár [Cluj]). Author of several books and many studies on the facts and memorialization of the Holocaust in Hungary and Transylvania, he is also the director of the Institute for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at the BBU. Together with the late Professor Randolph L. Braham (City University of New York, USA), he edited The Geographic Encyclopedia of the Holocaust in Hungary, and The Geographic Encyclopedia of the Holocaust in Northern Transylvania. He is also the author of a book on the refuge and rescue of the Jews during the Holocaust across the Hungarian-Romanian border and of a monograph of the Jewish High School of Cluj. Contact: tibori@fspac.ro
András Tóth-Bartos is a historian who received his education at the Babeș-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and the Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Hungary. He is currently affiliated with the Székely National Museum in Sfântu Gheorghe, Romania. His research interests encompass the agrarian policies and land reforms implemented by the Hungarian and Romanian governments during the interwar period, the reintegration and regional development of Northern Transylvania following the Second Vienna Award, and the socio-economic impacts of the 1968 administrative reform in Romania. Contact: tbadexter@gmail.com
Virgiliu-Leon Țârău (D.Sc.) is a professor at the Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca. Between June 2007 and March 2018, he also served as Vice-President of the Collegium of the National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives in Bucharest. He is the author or editor of fourteen books and more than seventy scientific articles. Contact: virgiliu.tarau@ubbcluj.ro
Efraim Zuroff (Ph.D.) is currently the chief Nazi-hunter of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the director of its Israel Office and Eastern European Affairs. For the past forty-three years, he has been involved in the efforts to track down and help bring to justice Nazi war criminals, initially (1980-1986) as a sole researcher in Israel for the Office of Special Investigations of the United States Justice Department, and for the past thirty-eight years (1986-2024) as the chief Nazi-hunter of the Wiesenthal Center. He earned his Ph.D. in Holocaust Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is the author of four books and more than 500 articles, reviews, and reports on the history of the Holocaust and its aftermath and their impact on contemporary Jewish identity. His most recent book, Musiskiai: Kelione Su Priesu (Our People; Journey with an Enemy) was published by Alma Littera in late January 2016 and was number-one on the bestseller list in Lithuania. It has since been published in Polish, Hebrew, English, Swedish, Japanese, Dutch, and Russian translations. His previous book, Operation “Last Chance”: One Man’s Quest to Bring Nazi Criminals to Justice (Palgrave/Macmillan, hardcover 2009/paperback 2011), has also been published in French, German, Polish, Hungarian, Serbian, Romanian, Croatian, and Finnish editions. His annual report, published since 2002, on the “Worldwide Investigation and Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals” is considered the authoritative source on the subject and can be viewed at www.operationlastchance.org. Nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2008, Dr. Zuroff is also honorary citizen of the Serbian city of Novi Sad and recipient of a Croatian state medal for his efforts to bring Nazi war criminals to justice. In 2017, he was awarded a Gold Medal of Merit from Serbian President Nikolic and in December 2018, received the annual “Fiddler on the Roof” Award from the Russian Federation of Jewish Communities for his fight against Holocaust distortion and revisionism. Dr. Zuroff resides in Israel, is the father of four children and has sixteen grandchildren. Contact: efraimzuroff2@gmail.com
Abstracts
NICOLAE DRĂGUȘIN
Abstract:
This paper aims at analyzing the legal definitions of Jews in romania and Hungary between 1938 and 1944. it does so by focusing on the interplay of the legislators’ racial conceptions, on the one hand, and the roles played by citizenship and conversion to christianity justifying exceptions, on the other hand. This interplay is better understood in the changing political contexts of both countries. The legal definitions produced in Romania in the form of government decree-laws and in Hungary in that of parliamentary laws were not without connection with the different ways in which both countries had addressed the historical so-called “Jewish question” before 1918 and with the transformation of antisemitism after 1918. The paper makes use of the definitions ascribed to Jews and Jewry in the decree-laws and laws, respectively, as primary sources.
Keywords: citizenship, Jew, Holocaust, law, Romania, Hungary, antisemitism
JEHUDA HARTMAN
Abstract:
How was it possible in 1944, in the geographical center of a Europe being consumed by flames, where millions of Jews had already been murdered, that a large Jewish community could still believe that it would continue to live in peace? Why did Jews continue to nurture an idyllic picture of the past, even as it became increasingly inconsistent with the present? What motivated the Jewish leaders, and many ordinary Jews, to adhere devotedly to their Hungarian national identity? How can we explain such a chasm between the self-perception of the Jews and the attitudes of the surrounding society? What led a noted Orthodox leader to declare, just weeks before the invasion, which enjoyed widespread cooperation from so many Hungarians, that after the war, Hungary would gain “eternal admiration thanks to its sublime thought and humanity?”
Keywords: deportation, illusions, German occupation.
ATTILA GIDÓ
Abstract:
This study is an attempt to fill some of the historiographical gaps regarding the attitude of the Hungarian-linked Christian churches of Northern Transylvania towards the Jewish question between 1940 and 1944. According to the Hungarian census of 1941, members of the Roman Catholic, Evangelical Lutheran, Reformed (Calvinist) and Unitarian churches made up almost the entire Hungarian population of Northern Transylvania and almost half of the total population. My analysis is based on documents found in some of the regional archives of these churches. This is a preliminary sketch which, although it brings new insights into the subject, can and should be expanded by further research. I will show that the Christian churches had a differentiated policy towards baptized Jews and towards the Jewish population as a whole. In general, they supported the anti-Jewish Hungarian laws and profited economically from the expropriation of Jewish property. During the ghettoization and deportations of 1944, the churches’ attitude towards Jews changed slightly. This can be seen in the increased number of baptisms. The conclusion of the paper is that there were personal cases where priests or church leaders tried to help and save Jewish people, but the Christian churches in Northern Transylvania as institutions had an ambiguous policy towards the persecuted Jewish population.
Keywords: Northern Transylvania, Holocaust, Christian churches, conversion of Jews, Jewish properties
JUDIT KÓNYA
Abstract:
This paper discusses the consequences of the decree requiring the compulsory stunning of animals for slaughtering (April 1938) in Hungary and in the territories re-annexed to it by the two Vienna awards. The decree banning Jewish ritual slaughtering had anti-Jewish motives, following the German example; it opened a long series of further anti-Jewish laws. Both the Ministry of agriculture’s archival documents and the rabbinic sources in Hebrew show that the decree could not be enforced in all provinces, nor was its violation sanctioned with equal determination everywhere: enforcing the Ministry’s will depended on local circumstances. Since the decree was unenforceable in Transcarpathia and northern Transylvania, due to the high number of Orthodox, religiously observant Jews, a new decree (of January 1940) exempted the slaughterhouses there from observing it. The compulsory stunning of animals had a severe impact on the Jewish religious communities in Hungary, both economically and spiritually. The economic situation of the poorer, typically Orthodox Jewish communities, was substantially worsened by the non-payment of the tax on meat. In addition, the decree sent a clear message to the Jewish community: the Hungarian State interfered in religious practices, even when the interests of the country dictated otherwise. According to archival documents, the drastic reduction in the number of ritual slaughterings not only made it impossible for Jewish communities to survive but also threatened the livelihoods of all those involved in the meat industry. in 1938, the Hungarian administration put the “humanization” of animal slaughtering before the economic interests of the country.
Keywords: anti-Jewish legislation, halakha, Holocaust, Hungary, responsa literature, ritual slaughtering
PAUL SHAPIRO
Abstract:
These reflections draw on decades of involvement with the history and politics of the Holocaust in Romania, Hungary, and Transylvania. Under communism, the holocaust was a nearly taboo subject. This did not prevent the Romanians from drawing attention to certain crimes of the Horthy regime, nor did it prevent the publication in Hungary of some studies on the tragedy of the Hungarian Jews. But public awareness of the holocaust was low. More serious confrontation with the holocaust began following 1989, but reaffirmations of nationalism in the wake of Soviet domination led to tolerance for public manifestations of antisemitism and to an extended period of uncertainty in confronting the criminal records of the Horthy and Antonescu regimes. The holocaust-related policies of Hungary and Romania were not “in synch” during the holocaust or during communism, and have remained “out of synch” through the entire post-communist period. This “out-of-synch-ness” and the broader animosity between the two countries, fatal for Jews during the Holocaust, continues to induce insecurity among Jews. in the early post-communist years, it made little difference who was in charge – communist regime holdovers in Romania or center-right and center-left governments in Hungary. Holocaust denial and distortion were the norm in both countries. Their respective paths diverged with the establishment of the Wiesel Commission, which put Romania on a path toward a more honest confrontation with the past. No analogous course correction has occurred in Hungary, with significant negative consequences for the country’s democracy, international standing, and relationship with the truth.
Keywords: antisemitism, distortion, holocaust memorial/holocaust museum, “out-of synch-ness”, Wiesel Commission
MARIANA HAUSLEITNER
Abstract:
While being interrogated in 1945 in Moscow, Gustav Richter, Eichmann’s representative in Bucharest, claimed that Mihai Antonescu had agreed, in July 1942, to the plan of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt to begin with the deportation of the Jews from southern Transylvania. The plan was made public in a press conference and published on 8 August 1942 in the newspaper Bucharest Daily. In spite of the German envoy Manfred von Killinger’s declaration of 15 September that preparations for the deportation had been finalized, no Romanian representative took part in the conference in Berlin from 26 to 28 September, in which the schedule for the transportation trains was drawn up. As the reason for their absence, the Bukarester Tageblatt of 11 October specifically referred to Franz Baron von Neumann’s and Wilhelm Filderman’s interventions. On 12 December, Von Killinger stated in resignation that one could no longer assume that the deportations would take place. This article discusses the extent to which the reports of the German envoy, Killinger, and the Swiss envoy, René de Weck, can explain why the deportation plan failed.
Keywords: Romania, Germany, Switzerland, Jews, deportations
LÁSZLÓ KARSAI
Abstract:
In our study, we would like to answer the following questions: after the occupation of Hungary on 19 March 1944, what was the relationship between the German occupiers and the Hungarian authorities: did the latter obey the former in everything, or, on the contrary, took the initiative, enthusiastically, almost forced the Germans to “take over” hundreds of thousands of Jews from Hungary? Is it true that the Germans had no “master plan” for the deportation of the Hungarian Jews? And finally, could the Hungarian Jews have survived the Holocaust?
Keywords: Holocaust, 1944 invasion of Hungary, collaboration, cooperation
JUDIT MOLNÁR
Abstract:
Following the German occupation of Hungary, the government of Döme Sztójay, appointed by Regent Miklós Horthy on 22 March 1944, enacted a series of anti-Jewish decrees ranging from discrimination to plunder, to segregation, and eventually to deportation. Nearly 440 thousand Hungarian citizens classified as Jews were deported to the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camps. Cooperation between the Hungarian and German authorities was basically harmonious, but on some occasions not without conflict. Horthy gave a free hand to the government. The Prime-Minister, most of his ministers, and the state secretaries responsible for the “Jewish question” regularly consulted the competent German authorities. At local level, the heads of the Gendarmerie districts, prefects, deputy prefects, and mayors consulted German advisers at meetings and banquets. The main question of my research: For what reasons were the deportation trains from some of the collection camps in southern and south-eastern Hungary not destined for Auschwitz-Birkenau, as originally planned, but for Strasshof, which offered a better chance of survival? Other questions I will try to answer are: Why was the route changed only in those areas? At what level and who decided on the route? What did the heads of the provincial administration and public security services know, or were they aware of the decision-making process? Did they have any say in who was put on each train? Was there uniformity in the implementation, e.g., in Pécs, Barcs, Bácsalmás, Szeged, or Szabadka? To answer these questions, I will draw partly on contemporary documents (e.g., the reports of Gendarmerie Lieutenant-Colonel László Ferenczy, the reports he received), partly on post-WWII memoirs (e.g., Rezső Kasztner’s report), and partly on the People’s Court documents of Gendarmerie officers, Police officers, mayors, etc. (e.g., Gendarmerie Colonel László Hajnácskőy, Gendarmerie Captain Imre Finta, deputy mayor Béla Tóth).
Keywords: authorities, deportations, Gendarmerie, Holocaust, Hungary, Strasshof
GEORGE EISEN
Abstract:
Most accounts of the Holocaust focus on trainloads of prisoners speeding toward Auschwitz, with its chimneys belching smoke and flames, in the summer of 1944. In 1941-1942, more than twenty thousand Hungarian Jews, most of them from Transcarpathia and northern Transylvania, were deported to Galicia and summarily executed. In exploring the fate of these Hungarian Jews and their local coreligionists, this new research transcends conventional history by introducing a multitude of layers regarding politics, culture, and, above all, psychology – especially that of the motivation, rationale, and personality of the killers. Relatively low-level SS officials in charge of security outposts with primarily normal police personnel transferred from Vienna, Berlin, and other Reich cities to the east started and carried out the extermination. They were assisted by reserve Police Battalions. This research concentrates on one of these SS officers, SS-Untersturmführer and Kriminalkommissar der Polizei Peter Leideritz, who orchestrated the killings of over eighty-five thousand people.
Keywords: Hungarian Jewry, Galicia, mass murders, retribution, SS
LÁSZLÓ CSŐSZ
Abstract:
This article provides a comparative microhistory of the mass executions and other war crimes committed against the Roma in Hungary from the early autumn of 1944 to the early spring of 1945. First, the article examines the history of the long-standing anti-Roma social discrimination and state violence vis-à-vis antisemitic policies, which formed the context of wartime genocide. Second, it sheds light on the social dynamics and situational factors leading to the “qualitative leap” in anti-Roma policies in the maelstrom of the approaching front. Facing inconsistent persecution before the summer of 1944, the Roma were now collectively made responsible for the atrocities committed by the Allied troops and regarded as “traitors” as an act of scapegoating. Hungarian and German army troops, gendarmerie, and “Arrow Cross” Party paramilitaries indiscriminately slaughtered entire Roma families and even small communities in at least ten localities throughout Hungary. Thousands of Roma were detained and deported to concentration camps in Germany. Seeking the answer to the key question “why”, the article also scrutinizes the profiles and motivations of the perpetrators, as well as the direct and indirect roles of the non-Roma neighbors in the events. The sources analyzed include first-hand accounts of survivors and eyewitnesses, wartime administrative records and press reports, as well as post-war investigative and trial records.
Keywords: Genocide of the Roma, mass killing, antigypsyism, antisemitism, Hungary
ANDERS E.B. BLOMQVIST
Abstract:
This study examines the Jewish experience of economic nationalization in the Hungarian Romanian ethnic borderlands, focusing on the Princz family’s history from the early 1900s to the present. Their experience was characterized by a dual existence of belonging to, and yet being apart from, majority societies. The Princz family achieved conditional inclusion by cultivating political connections among the elite and leveraging their managerial and engineering expertise. This enabled them to secure economic success and protection. Ármin Princz’s dedication to the Hungarian minority’s cause in interwar Romania earned him enough national merit to be exempted from anti-Jewish legislation, allowing him to attain the status of a “non-Jewish full Jew”. However, his brother József, despite his First World War service as a decorated Magyar patriot, did not receive this status and ultimately perished in the Holocaust. The family’s Jewish identity set them apart, not only through the devastation of the Holocaust, but also through their ability to adapt to shifting national regimes, skillfully navigating magyar, Romanian, and Hungarian rule. This adaptability extended to post-World War II migration, as the Princz family successfully relocated and rebuilt their businesses abroad. Continued antisemitism forced them to adopt strategies to obscure their Jewish identity, including changing their names and downplaying their past. The Princz family’s story highlights the broader themes of survival, resilience, and strategic accommodation in the face of shifting political landscapes and ongoing discrimination.
Keywords: conditioned inclusion, economic nationalizing, exemptions, Holocaust, Northern Transylvania
TÓTH-BARTOS ANDRÁS
Abstract:
After the First World War, the land tenure policy was employed as a tool for ethnic policy. In the newly-acquired territories, measures were primarily implemented so as to benefit the state-forming nation, often at the expense of the ethnic minorities. During the 1930s, in both Hungary and Romania, an intensified antisemitic discourse led to the promulgation of several acts, by the end of the decade and thereafter, explicitly aimed at first restraining and then eliminating the Jewish presence from the economy. Following the Second Vienna Award, the Hungarian land-tenure policy in Transylvania adopted a Magyarizing character, primarily focusing on restricting the number of Romanian-owned properties. The legislation concerning the Jewish landed property, including Act no. 1939: IV and Act no. 1942: XV, was also extended to northern Transylvania. This paper analyzes the Hungarian land-tenure policy in northern Transylvania with regard to Jewish property, specifically focusing on the measures enacted in accordance with the provisions of Act no. 1942: XV, until the period of German occupation in 1944.
Keywords: Fourth Jewish Law, Jewish property, Hungary, land tenure and agrarian policy, northern Transylvania
ENIKŐ ORSOLYA NAGYI
Abstract:
In the early 1940s, the anti-Jewish legislation in Hungary, driven by the Horthy regime, systematically stripped Jews living in the country of their rights, property, and livelihoods. Jews were excluded from public life, dispossessed of assets ranging from houses and farmland to businesses, and ultimately ghettoized and handed over to the Nazi forces. This study focuses on Northern Transylvania, where anti-Jewish policies permeated all levels of society, including law enforcement, the local administration, and the general population. A central role was played by the regional press, which not only documented the confiscation of Jewish property, but also normalized and encouraged the participation of the public in the process. A press analysis reveals how the media served as a tool of propaganda, fostering state and public interest in the spoils of anti-Jewish measures and reflecting a widespread complicity. The research draws on then-contemporary newspaper coverage to trace the progression of looting and the post-war challenges of property restitution.
Keywords: anti-Jewish measures, confiscations, Holocaust, Hungary, Northern Transylvania, property
ȘTEFAN CRISTIAN IONESCU
Abstract:
As a result of the Second World War and its complicated history, the few returning Jewish Holocaust survivors experienced in Northern Transylvania a more complicated restitution process, compared to the Jews in the other parts of Romania. This happened, because the community had a much lower survival rate, its property had been Aryanized under the Hungarian government which had controlled the region from 1940 to 1944 and had to navigate the restitution procedures under a special law adopted in July 1945. The region also experienced tensed interethnic relations and occasional violence. This paper investigates the socio-political context for the emergence of the restitution of Jewish property in Northern Transylvania in early post-Holocaust Romania. It focuses on the historical context surrounding the efforts of the Jewish survivors to rebuild their lives, on the stipulations and problems that occurred in the reparatory process, as well as on several cases of court litigation of Jewish survivors for the restitution of their former assets during the early postwar years.
Keywords: Aryanization, Holocaust, Northern Transylvania, survivors, restitution
OVIDIU CREANGĂ
Abstract:
Since the end of the Holocaust, Jews from greater Hungary who survived the nazi persecution have faced many challenges in their quest for compensation. This reality seemed impossible to reconcile with their lived experience as survivors of expropriation, deportation and extermination. While transitional justice scholars have extensively criticized Germany’s indemnification program for its restrictive criteria, which severely disadvantaged Holocaust survivors from Eastern Europe, including Hungary, few have paid attention to the ways in which those barriers to compensation have been reduced over the years for uncompensated, or only minimally compensated, victims of the Holocaust. This chapter traces the efforts of the Claims Conference to secure financial compensation from Germany for the Hungarian Holocaust survivors. It reviews German federal and supplementary programs that were amended or created anew as a result of its advocacy to compensate Hungarian Holocaust survivors. This new funding, obtained after much negotiation and always long overdue, represented a small measure of justice for the Hungarian victims of the Holocaust.
Keywords: Claims Conference, compensation, Germany, Holocaust, Hungary, survivors
FRANK BARON
Abstract:
Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler’s escape from Auschwitz, on 7 April 1944, was extraordinary in its daring, courageous execution, and impact. The challenging task of the two escapees was to inform the world of previously unimaginable crimes, and to do so in a way that made the unbelievable believable. Because the deportations to Auschwitz were still in progress, it was essential to inform the threatened Jewish populations that they were slated by the Germans to be part of the “final Solution”. When and how the transmission of the resulting text took place made all the difference. Decisive transmissions involved secret networks in Switzerland and Hungary, taking place independently. Despite the presence of the Gestapo and the German Army, finally, in early July 1944, two independent, increasingly powerful efforts, engendered primarily by the report, converged in Budapest. Only then could one of the most remarkable rescues of World War II take place. Without wishing to detract from the courageous actions of Ferenc Koszorús, my research has identified crucial actions of Elizabeth Wiskeman in Switzerland and Lajos Kudar, as well as Géza Soos in Hungary, as instrumental for this success.
Keywords: Auschwitz Report, Rudolf Vrba, Alfred Wetzler, Hungary, Switzerland
FRED R. BLEAKLEY
Abstract:
The common phrase “timing is everything” is particularly apt in assessing the importance of the escape of Czesław Mordowicz and Arnost Rošin from Auschwitz on 27 May 1944. Would the more than two hundred thousand Jews of Budapest have been saved from deportation to Auschwitz if the report of Mordowicz and Rosin had not corroborated earlier testimony of two other escapees? Answering this question requires a careful look at the timing of the testimony of the two pairs of escapees and when influential action was taken. The Auschwitz gas chambers had already taken the lives of four hundred thousand Hungarian Jewish men, women, and children. It was “the most concentrated and methodical deportation and massacre program of the war, a slaughter machine that functioned, perfectly oiled, for forty-six days on end”, wrote historian Gerald Reitlinger.
Keywords: collaboration, deportation, intermediaries, timing, testimony
ATTILA NOVÁK
Abstract:
A few years ago, the Budapest City Archives came into possession of important documents of Ernő Szilágyi (a member of the Kasztner Group and a Hungarian Zionist leader, who was also known as Zvi in the movement) and his family. The collection contains the papers of him, László Szilágyi (his brother), and his wife, Borbála Szentgyörgyi, and her family. The Szilágyi family (originally called Sterzfinger) originates from kaposvár. The identified fond contains a lot of material, but perhaps the most valuable are those from relatives, friends, and acquaintances who wrote to lászló Szilágyi about what had happened to them in 1944. The materials also include (of course) Ernő Szilágyi’s personal papers, such as correspondence with the Swiss authorities, when he continued to organize Keren Kayemeth Leyisrael (the Jewish National Fund) there for a few years after 1945. Some of the texts for which it is not known who wrote them may also have been those of Ernő Szilágyi; this can be decided based on style characteristics.
Keywords: Holocaust, Kasztner group, memoir, Ernő Szilágyi, Zionists
ZOLTÁN TIBORI-SZABÓ
Abstract:
In May 1944, at the request of Georges Mantello-Mandel, Florin E. Manoliu, the economic counsellor of the Romanian legation in bern, Switzerland, agreed to take a thousand San Salvadorian citizenship certificates to Northern Transylvania for Mantello’s relatives and friends. At the railway station in Vienna, he was detained by the German authorities, taken to Berlin, investigated, and threatened not to interrupt his journey to Bucharest in Hungary. The Romanian diplomat finally arrived in Bucharest, from where he traveled to northern Transylvania. But there were no Jews left in any of the towns in that province, belonging to Hungary then. He took the certificates to Budapest, where he gave them to Mose (Miklós) Krausz, the representative of the Palestine agency, hiding in the Swiss legation building in Budapest. From Krausz, who had been contacted with the help of the Swiss vice-consul Carl Lutz, Manoliu obtained an extremely important document compiled from several Auschwitz Protocols written by escapees, that he then handed over to Mantello in Geneva, at dawn, on 21 June 1944. This was to be the source of the information disseminated throughout the Allied press in the following years about what had happened at Auschwitz. Manoliu was prosecuted for corruption after the war, once acquitted, fled illegally from Romania to Switzerland in 1947. He later settled in Argentina, where he was a professor at the University of Bahia Blanca. This study aims to shed light on some of the details of his mission, as well as his life and fate, in the specific context of the war and post-war years.
Keywords: Auschwitz reports, diplomacy, intelligence, Florin Manoliu, nazi Germany
VIRGILIU-LEON ȚÂRĂU
Abstract:
The paper discusses, in the light of new information, the fate of the Jewish community from Cluj in the former half of 1944. The focus is on the escape routes (luna de Sus and Făget in particular) initiated by some Romanian locals from Cluj during World War II (Aurel Socol Jr. in the forefront). These routes were used in the spring and early summer of 1944 to save members of the Jewish community. Based on new information researched in the archives at the national level (National Archives, Ministry of the Interior, Gendarmerie and Police Fonds, and the CNAS Archives), and also at the local level (Cluj and Turda), the presentation tries to describe how the networks were constructed, how they functioned, and the results of their wartime activities. Looking at the routes during the war helps us evaluate the changes that took place in 1944 and how the networks managed (in some cases) to
circumvent the counter-measures of the Hungarian and Romanian authorities.
Keywords: escaping networks, escaping routes, northern Transylvania, Romanian-Hungarian border, saviors
GÁBOR ÁDÁM
Abstract:
The hundreds of Jewish cemeteries throughout Transylvania serve as a genuine testament to Jewish life and provide a connection between the descendants of the Jews who left the region before or after the Holocaust. In addition to those who look for their Transylvanian ancestors for traditional or religious reasons, an increasing number of people have recently expressed a desire to become citizens of Europe in honor of their Transylvanian ancestors. In addition to presenting a few concrete cases of how the graves of those ancestors believed to be missing have been found and the cemetery “put in its place”, my study aims at raising awareness of the importance of preserving these cemeteries in a proper way and making all information about them available. It would be necessary not only to photograph the gravestones and organize the inscriptions in a database, but also to systematically search for and process other materials (cemetery registers, documents relating to burial bureaucracy, etc.).
Keywords: burial records, genealogy, Jewish cemeteries, memory, Transylvania, tombstones
BINYAMIN HUNYADI
Abstract:
Volf Tambur (Vladimir Tamburu, 1915-1995) began his Yiddish literary career in interwar Romania, but only achieved prominence after the communist takeover of the country, particularly during the years of the so-called “minor cultural revolution” introduced by Nicolae Ceaușescu. Tambur’s first Yiddish-language novel, Friling on zun (Sunless Spring), published in Arad in 1947, the first part of a planned trilogy, was one of the earliest literary treatments of the Holocaust in Transylvania. His later works, written in the 1970s and 1980s, woven around the same theme, drew a different picture of the Holocaust in Romania than generally accepted by the official Romanian historiography, or commonly presented by the literature of other minority languages, such as Hungarian and German, or in the majority Romanian literature. This article discusses Tambur’s first novel, his rise to prominence under the communist regime, and his role in the Yiddish-language cultural establishment during the Ceaușescu era, and lastly his writings on the Transylvanian chapter of the Holocaust and its aftermath in communist Romania. Furthermore, the article sheds light on the status and assigned role of Yiddish under the Ceaușescu regime, the policies of remembrance and representation of the Holocaust in Romania, and finally the power dynamics between the Party directives and the authors’ personal agency in the Yiddish cultural milieu.
Keywords: Holocaust literature in Yiddish, Ceaușescu era, Holocaust in Transylvania, minor Cultural Revolution, Volf Tambur
GYÖRGY CSEPELI
Abstract:
A black hole’s attractive force is so strong in a galaxy that it swallows forever anything that gets too close. In the course of our research into the local memory patterns of the Holocaust in Hungary, we have found that the events of the fatal year 1944 have been swallowed by black holes of the collective memory. As time has passed, these black holes have become more impenetrable. The study to be presented will attempt to reveal the painful memories buried deeply in the black holes of the local communities’ past.
Keywords: Holocaust, Hungary, memory, memorialization, Transylvania, trauma
RICHÁRD PAPP
Abstract:
Over two years ago, our teamwork started researching the local memory of the holocaust in Hungarian settlements. We used qualitative social science methods to explore and interpret contemporary meanings of holocaust memory. One of the most important and thought-provoking findings of our research relates to the almost complete absence of visible local signs of the holocaust, but also to the term “taboo” that appears repeatedly in our interviewees’ narratives. Thus, my paper will attempt to interpret the significances of “taboo” and absence associated with holocaust memory and their historical and contemporary social contexts.
Keywords: absence, holocaust, Hungary, memorialization, local memory, taboos.
ADAM KERPEL-FRONIUS
Abstract:
The mass deportation of Jews from Hungary was nearly the final and one of the most momentous chapters of the Holocaust. Still, despite its significance, this pivotal chapter does not receive nearly as much attention in the collective international memory of the Holocaust as it would arguably deserve. This is especially true about the history of the deportation of Jews from northern Transylvania – outside of the geographic region where the events took place, they are hardly known and much less understood. The reasons for this underexposure are manifold: the complexity of the region’s history, the persisting linguistic barriers, the complex entanglement of responsibilities between the German occupiers and the Hungarian authorities for sending hundreds of thousands of Jews to their deaths are significant factors that contribute to this deficiency, and so was the enduring silence of post-war Hungary and Romania that covered up this difficult past for nearly half a century. In this presentation, we will consider prominent examples of how the history of the Holocaust in northern Transylvania is presented outside the region, how memorial culture focusing on this chapter evolves both in and outside the region, reflect upon some of the difficulties in making this history relatable to a wider international public, and consider how to try to tackle them in the future.
Keywords: deportations, northern Transylvania, memorialization, international reflection
EFRAIM ZUROFF
Abstract:
In 2004, the “Simon Wiesenthal” Center launched its flagship project to attempt to identify and hopefully facilitate the prosecution of Nazi perpetrators in Hungary, the sixth country in which the project was initiated (the others were Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia in 2002, and Austria, Romania, and Poland in 2003). The project offered financial rewards for valuable information, which could assist in finding criminals alive and healthy enough to be prosecuted. Despite the fact that the extent of the Hungarian participation in the mass murdering of Jews was more limited than that of other collaborators in Eastern Europe, several Hungarian suspects were identified and indicted. The lecture describes the cases and explains the outcomes of the legal proceedings, both in Hungary and overseas.
Keywords: Hungary, Nazi perpetrators, Nazi-hunters, identification, prosecution

